zig-zag.jpg
Do you consider this painting to be art?

If yes … do you still think it’s art if it’s painted by a four year old?

And if yes … do you still think it’s art if it’s painted by the parent of a four year old and then passed off as the child’s work?

These and many other questions get a shiny new coat in the upcoming documentary about young artist Marla Olmstead in My Kid Could Paint That. Check out the new trailer after the jump:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDgwinV4to8[/youtube]

Marla has been painting since she was two years old. By the ripe old age of five, Marla had sold over $300,000 worth of paintings and had been featured in The New York Times. However, controversy has followed the young prodigy; not only has her talent blown the lid off of the stuffy, pretentious art world, but she has also dodged constant accusations of fraud.

Frankly, from what I can see in the trailer, the finished paintings look nothing like the techniques she uses in these clips. Who knows. If she is actually painting these things, then she should be encouraged as much as possible. But if not, then the parents need to go to prison for a little while and be forced to read the definition of “fraud” in the dictionary.

One of my favorite Sketchcasters, Iron Spike, has weighed in with her opinion about the subject:

Thanks Norm at Meet In The Lobby!